The Emergency Medical Services Sleep Health Study: A cluster-randomized trial.

Sleep health. 2023;9(1):64-76

Plain language summary

Severe mental and physical fatigue in shift work occupations is widespread, and workplace fatigue impacts a great majority of the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) clinician first responders. The hypothesis of this study was that education and training focused on sleep health and fatigue, delivered in an asynchronous manner and tailored to EMS shift workers, would result in improvements in sleep quality and a reduction in self-reported fatigue after a 3-month study interval. This study was a cluster-randomised, 2-arm randomised trial with a wait-list control group. EMS agencies (clusters) were randomised to either the intervention group or a wait-list control group. Results showed that intention-to-treat analyses revealed no differences in measures of sleep quality or fatigue at 3 months or 6 months follow-up. Per protocol analyses showed that the greater the number of education modules viewed, the greater the improvement in sleep quality and the greater the reduction in fatigue at 3-month follow-up. Authors conclude that the findings of this study may be useful to EMS administrators when designing fatigue risk management programmes.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Greater than half of emergency medical services (EMS) clinician shift workers report poor sleep, fatigue, and inadequate recovery between shifts. We hypothesized that EMS clinicians randomized to receive tailored sleep health education would have improved sleep quality and less fatigue compared to wait-list controls after 3 months. METHODS We used a cluster-randomized, 2-arm, wait-list control study design (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04218279). Recruitment of EMS agencies (clusters) was nationwide. Our study was powered at 88% to detect a 0.4 standard deviation difference in sleep quality with 20 agencies per arm and a minimum of 10 individuals per agency. The primary outcome was measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at 3-month follow-up. Our intervention was accessible in an online, asynchronous format and comprised of 10 brief education modules that address fatigue mitigation topics prescribed by the American College of Occupational Environmental Medicine. RESULTS In total, 36 EMS agencies and 678 individuals enrolled. Attrition at 3 months did not differ by study group (Intervention = 17.4% vs. Wait-list control = 18.2%; p = .37). Intention-to-treat analyses detected no differences in PSQI and fatigue scores at 3 months. Per protocol analyses showed the greater the number of education modules viewed, the greater the improvement in sleep quality and the greater the reduction in fatigue (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS While intention-to-treat analyses revealed no differences in sleep quality or fatigue at 3 months, per protocol findings identified select groups of EMS clinician shift workers who may benefit from sleep health education. Our findings may inform fatigue risk management programs.

Lifestyle medicine

Fundamental Clinical Imbalances : Neurological
Patient Centred Factors : Mediators/Sleep
Environmental Inputs : Psychosocial influences ; Mind and spirit
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Sleep and relaxation
Functional Laboratory Testing : Not applicable

Methodological quality

Jadad score : 3
Allocation concealment : Yes

Metadata

Nutrition Evidence keywords : Sleep